The Fundamental Laws Of Porn

Filed under: Other — stomachpunch at 12:53 pm on Tuesday, February 20, 2007

#1: whores lie
#2: male performers have NO stroke value
#3: way too much man-ass in hetero porn (please minimize the use of the dreaded “ball-cam” angle. Any amount of time that 70% of the screen is occupied by the dude’s ass and nut sack is too much)
#4: double-pen in the same orifice is gay
#5: Generally, European porn stars are much dirtier than their American counterparts
#6: when a dude is getting it up the ass, no matter if it’s from a woman, tranny or another dude, it’s gay
#7: if you have a small dick and fuck like a chick with a strap on you shouldn’t be a stunt cock
#8: interracial gangbangs demonstrate how far we’ve come as a country regarding race
#9: if she doesn’t do anal, and she’s not Christy Canyon, she’s not a legitimate porn star
#10: piss, vomit and/or scat ain’t sex(y)
#11: too many tattoos and piercings and it becomes an unpleasant freak show
#12: if you must show cunnilingus, make sure the guy doesn’t have a moustache (see Ron Jeremey and Christy Canyon; looks like the Tribbles Star Trek episode)
#13: the male talent shall keep grunting and moaning to a minimum
#14: don’t jump to the guy’s face during the money shot
#15: there shall be no unattended pussy in a FFM threesome scene at any time
#16: close up shots have their place, but it’s not two thirds of the movie; pull back, establish and let us get on with the important business of jerking off to the whole girl, not just the meat piston
#17: genuine sounds of balls slapping against girl’s ass or cock slamming into wet cunt shall not be interrupted by talents’ over dramatic moaning or porn banter
#18: The bts interviewer shall not ask how the girl got into porn if she’s been doing porn longer than 6 months
#19: if it’s a comp, let the box cover say it’s a comp; don’t dress it up as all new scenes
#20: if the movie is shot in HD, cast must have good complexions (and definitely, no ass zits)
#21: if it’s on the box, it shall be in the movie
#22: if an act is described as “her first time”, it shall not be common knowledge that it is far from her first time
#23: unless your name is Andrew Blake, let us hear the actual noises instead of the music, no matter how much you paid your cousin to create it with Pro Tools
#24: squirt is pee (see #10)
#25: every whore has a price
#26: the more cum that lands above her mouth, and the more surprised/upset she is about it, the better; if she actually starts to whimper, it’s rewind time
#27: in porn, for every one great boob job, there are 76 shit ones around the corner
#28: someone else’s baby jam on/in a girl is off limits; stick your dick elsewhere or towel her off/make her swallow
#29: nine out of ten whores say they are in porn for the “great sex” and “close friendships,” when in reality they are motivated in the following order of importance: 60% money/Donna Karan sunglasses/Gucci handbags; 20% getting back at their fucking asshole parents; 10% support/augment drug dependency’; 10% support suitcase pimp’s drug dependency
#30: when a whore says they “don’t do drugs any more,” it means they still smoke unbelievable amounts of pot, and drink like fishes
#31: not all attention whores are porn girls, but all porn girls are attention whores
#32: if you have a catch-phrase, you’re a douche
#33: girls turn 18 every day
#34: retired whore makes a comeback = rent is due
#35: for every whore that leaves, two will take her place
#36: whores are never retired, they are just between sex-related “career opportunities”
#37: directors shall keep babbling to a minimum
#38: limit stills; flash bulbs going off is distracting
#39: big-budget porn (e.g. “Conquest”, “Private Gladiator”) is a waste of perfectly good money that could be better spent on costlier sex acts; i.e., would you rather see a wooden ship or an anal gangbang?
#40: slow-motion and replay shall be kept to the barest minimum

Source

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

A Defense Of Porno

Filed under: Feminist, Other — stomachpunch at 1:35 pm on Tuesday, February 6, 2007

It may come to a surprise to you but one of my best friends is a feminist. Ive known her for about 6-7 years know and itts very odd that we are friends, seeing as how I am in the porno industry and she is a staunch defender of the Feminist Mystique, however life works in strange and peculiar ways. Anyways the first day that I told her that I had landed a job at an adult company she lecture me for about an hour on how this would destroy my life and how I was contributing to the demise of exploited women. I took it in grace and told her not to worry, and that it was a job between jobs. A year and a half later Im still in the industry and shes still on my ass for being in the industry. Everytime we get in a fight she brings up the porno industry and attacks me from that angle. I got sick of it one day and sent her this article written by Mike, some dude. We still get into fights, but after that day, she has yet to attack me from the porno angle. So if ever the time comes when you need to defend yourself for watching porno, liking porno, or working in porno, bust this article out and own that mutha fucka who’s trying to get you down.

  1. "Pornography exploits children". Obviously, this assumes that all porno is child porno, which is a totally unreasonable generalization. I’ve seen a lot of porno, but I’ve never seen child porno. Snuff films exploit death; does this somehow mean that we should ban action movies?

  2. "Pornography degrades women". Again, this is an unreasonable generalization. It is unfortunately true that some porno depicts women as mere objects of sexual exploitation (although it should be noted that some porno also degrades men, particularly the sadomasochist porn in which a female "dominatrix" humiliates and abuses male "slaves"). However, one can’t generalize about porno based on its worst examples, any more than one should generalize about mainstream films based on movies which glorify violence or promote and/or affirm racial stereotypes. If we should ban all pornography which depicts acts of sexual assault and domination, should we also ban all movies which glorify violence?

  3. "When people view pornography, it is more likely that they will commit sexual assault." It is infuriating that this is almost always stated as a fact, even though there is no supporting evidence for this conclusion (even the shaky statistical correlations favoured by sociologists don’t exist). We are reminded that most rape involves porno, but that proves nothing because porno is a multi-billion dollar business with many tens of millions of customers, the vast majority of whom are not rapists. In fact, there are numerous European countries in which both pornography and prostitution are widespread and legal, yet the incidence of rape is much lower than it is in America (in Germany, for example, explicit pornography and prostitution are both legal, yet it has less than one quarter of America’s rate of sexual assault). Furthermore, even if we do accept these grossly unscientific claims of a causal relationship, this kind of reasoning is equally applicable to mainstream films which depict violence or promote or affirm racial and sexual stereotypes; should we ban them too?

  4. (Read on …)

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button